Talk:Nicholas de Balmyle

GA review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * jackturner3 (talk) 15:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * jackturner3 (talk) 15:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * jackturner3 (talk) 15:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Addressed the concerns. Hopefully to your satisfaction. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 01:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Contradiction?
In the second paragraph of the section #Bishop of Dunblane, it is said that Nicholas witnessed a number of royal acts, the last one on 8 February 1319. However, the last paragraph of the same section says that his last appearance on an act took place one year earlier, on 8 February 1318. It may just be a typo, but I cannot check the references. ( since you brought the article to GA status, I suppose you'd be the person to ask.) – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 22:17, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I checked the ODNB and it appears to be a typo. I have made the correction. – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 09:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)