Talk:Nick Mosby

Untitled
This article seems like it was written by a supporter or by someone close to the subject. A few example phrases that seem biased or un-objective are the following:

"He was equally successful as a Delegate passing legislation eliminating the draconian practice of selling liens of residents homes for unpaid water bills, developing tax credit programs to strengthen endowments of Maryland's Historically Black Colleges and Universities, requiring the state to allow GED recipients access to over $83 million annual dollars in state higher education scholarships, and passing Ban the Box statewide."

"This surprising political upset shocked the political establishment and received a lot of attention because it was the first time in almost thirty years where a political challenger beat a seated member of the Baltimore City Council."

"That interview would later be used by communication organizations and colleges as an example of staying on message despite surroundings and rapid fire questioning from reporters."

I think a revised page is merited. The third example could be justified if there's a source, but overall the page reads as un-objective. 2601:145:4380:9180:D471:AF88:AE96:2ED1 (talk) 21:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)bh
 * I completely agree and hope the revision I just posted moves us closer to a neutral point of view. I would also encourage future editors with a close connection to the article's subject to familiarize themselves with the site's policy on avoiding or disclosing conflicts of interest.Sauzer (talk) 20:43, 30 December 2020 (UTC)