Talk:Nigorobuna

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Carassius auratus grandoculis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://dspace.lib.kanazawa-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2297/22310/1/AN00044160-ED-NA-18-123.pdflformat=pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080220170152/http://www.pref.shiga.jp:80/l/kaiku/iinkaishiji/shiji/nigoroshigenkaifuku.html to http://www.pref.shiga.jp/l/kaiku/iinkaishiji/shiji/nigoroshigenkaifuku.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120608091239/http://www.pref.shiga.jp/g/suisan/biwakogyogyouwosasaerusakanatachi/nigorobuna.html to http://www.pref.shiga.jp/g/suisan/biwakogyogyouwosasaerusakanatachi/nigorobuna.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:31, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Taxonomy Section
I am confused by the taxonomy section of this article: it says that Nigorobuna is commonly regarded as Carassius Auratus Grandoculis. It then says that FishBase recognizes this as a separate species, and cites this link http://www.fishbase.se/summary/Carassius-cuvieri.html which is talking about Carassius cuvieri or the Japanese white crucian carp, a widely acknowledged species distinct from the common goldfish (Carassius Auratus). e.g. WoRMS recognizes Carassius cuvieri http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1021969. Why is a source about C. cuvieri used to suggest that fishbase recognizes C. Grandoculis as a separate species? Or is it intended to say that C. Grandoculis is really a variety of C. Cuiveri? Sorry for my confusion, its just I can't find any mention of "Grandoculis" or "Nigorobuna" or "Funas" at that link at all. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 08:50, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes this was a clerical error, I probably lifted the syntax from the C. cuvieri page and forgot to modify this to to make it link correctly to the auratus page..


 * The point I was trying to make was that FishBase failed to mention "grandoculis" or "nigoro-buna", and thus apparently did not endorse it as a subspecies. Therefore, you were actually expected NOT to find ""Grandoculis" or "Nigorobuna" or "Funas" at that link at all"


 * I should probably add that although there is no mention given in FishBase's current auratus page, something about "nigoro-buna" or "grandoculis" must have been mentioned in a species or subspecies page in the past (the 2009 version viewed 2010-12-03, to be more precise. Page not specified however ). It seems this possibility is something that has eluded you. --Kiyoweap (talk) 12:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)