Talk:Normal type

Better do away with Normal types, now; it is the same stuff.

Why still a "stub"?? 213.6.98.4 13:30, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

The latter part of this article, starting with the last sentence of the first paragraph, is pretty much incomprehensible to me, and the english seems pretty flawed. Honestly it feels like a translation-engine working on a wiki from another language. will someone clear this up? I really can't tell what a Normal Type is and how it is distinct from Weber's ideal type from this article. --71.245.108.184 00:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

What is this article about?
When I put a "context" tag here, this was my edit summary:
 * "Context" tag. I SUSPECT that this may be about types of PEOPLE, but I DON'T KNOW, even after reading the whole article!
 * "Context" tag. I SUSPECT that this may be about types of PEOPLE, but I DON'T KNOW, even after reading the whole article!

Michael Hardy (talk) 11:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The stub article was originated 6 years ago by an IP user 62.80.58.200 that locates in Germany and it has received only superficial adjustments since then. I suggest that the article title can be made less obscure by changing it to Normal type (personality). Cuddlyable3 (talk) 09:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)