Talk:North American Football League

Update: Grand theft charges
If this league was in fact merely a con from the beginning, then does that confirm the fact that it is not notable? Or does it just demonstrate that it is a notable con? 2600:1004:B11F:926C:3D54:F483:E18D:E160 (talk) 02:03, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * WP:GNG would be most applicable here. Just because it was shown to be a con doesn't not necessarily mean its non-notable.  WP:HOAX would not apply since there are a few other mentions out there about this league.  If you want to put it up for WP:AFD though, you will need to get an account here.  LionMans Account (talk) 01:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * May be AfD worthy based off of WP:EVENT (specifically WP:SENSATION) though. Might pass GNG if the report from the missed tryout camp in PA (from a Pittsburgh new source so possible WP:ROUTINE coverage) and the theft charge report both count as significant and independent coverage. Yosemiter (talk) 01:21, 8 July 2017 (UTC)