Talk:Nouvelle Action Royaliste

Fair use rationale for Image:Nar.PNG
Image:Nar.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Far-right??
This is in the cat far right but I do not why because I can find no evidence the article itself contradicts this . 安東尼  TALKies  23:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Absolutely not. This cat was added by a wikiwarrior who claims that all monarchist organisations - even the NAR, just a monarchist think-tank with centrist orientation in real politics - should be considered a priori as far-right. i think User:tazmaniacs should find a more suitable place for pushing his/her POV.Miacek (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clearing this up, some more article expansion with references would be good!-- 安東尼  TALK 圣诞快乐  19:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC)