Talk:Nuclear Blast

Expantion of History?
I think we should expand the History part of the page. I know that this page has been worked on alot but Im sure there is more about this label that is not on this page. HylAz (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Anullst-God's comments
They were originally put in the main article, but I've moved them here for convenience.

"Regarding Liquido. Someone check I don't see them on the list!!!" "I have added the bands that are/were with Nuclear Blast Records (USA). Please add in brackets wether they have lef and if possible which label they have moved to.". -- SoothingR(pour) 16:39, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Wikified
I've just Wikified and expanded this page drastically. Any more addition is welcome, such as band milestones, etc. ± Zork mid 02:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

In Flames
Shouldn't we at least mention In Flames in the article, who is, without doubt, the most famous band signed to Nuclear Blast? DJLarZ 20:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The article should mention In Flames as they are one the most well known bands signed to Nuclear Blast, however whether they are the most notable act signed to the label could be disputed. --Leon Sword 21:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Incubus
The link for Incubus is almost definitely wrong. I don't think that the alt-rock band Incubus was ever a part of grind or ever signed to NB. Daedae 20:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

non RIAA an major / IFPI members? Or one or the other
So it independent or major? In paragraph one, the template, and other categories). "Native" interwiki considers it an independent. On MyScpace - indi. I ask this because in the article, he "suddenly" has become a major, though that was not removed "independent label" Mistery Spectre (talk) 03:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Dissection
This band does not exist any more... So why the article says they are still signed to Nuclear Blast? This article definitely needs to be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.1.236.178 (talk) 10:53, 29 January 2012 (UTC)