Talk:One-nation conservatism/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) 08:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Would love to do it!  TheSpecialUser TSU 08:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Review


 * Images need WP:ALT
 * Please fix (too easy :))
 * Is it possible that you can make referencing like it is at India? (just want opinion as I see no trouble with the current version, but, the linkage will be little better)
 * that views society as organic and values paternalism and pragmatism - need a comma
 * Convert to
 * Concerned at this division, he supported measures to improve the lives of the people. - this is mentioned at the end of the para but this doesn't give me a stop. The sentence is making me yearn to read more and the para ends. I mean to say that it'd do much better in between the para or may be a re-phrase is in demand. Also if he supported then how did he do it? Or maybe you can also move the line in the next para
 * In 2006, Conservative MP - I would prefer using the fulform

I enjoyed reading this and this is clearly a pass! Excellent work.  TheSpecialUser TSU 15:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * May I but in, but please don't use . Instead, use  . Also, the dablink does not need to be fixed, as it is used at the top of the page in about. Thanks!  Thine   Antique   Pen   (public)  15:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Didn't notice that it was on top.  TheSpecialUser TSU 16:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your review. I'll take your comments in order.
 * As far as I'm aware, the caption serve as alt text if none is available. The one picture I've included has a descriptive enough caption.
 * Thanks TAP.
 * I could, but I don't know if it's necessary. There are not loads of references, and I've never really liked having links in the references unless necessary (it's not part of the Good Article criteria, anyway). Sorry if that sounds like I'm being difficult; it's just my opinion.
 * Done.
 * I've used 2 because, with 40em, the website addresses made it look lopsided. That also seems to be happening with; I get the feeling that one column might be better.

Sorry - short of time at the moment; I'll look at your other comments later. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 11:48, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

And the rest:
 * I've added some clarification there (and a fuller description is in the history section.
 * Done

That should be all; is there anything else that needs looking at? Thanks. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)