Talk:Onondaga Lake

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment
This article was the subject of an educational assignment at Syracuse University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from on 14:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2020 and 10 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Brandonmdaniels.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Salty?
In David dick's "History of the Sixx Nations" he jumps to lake Onondaga as "The salt Lake". was this lake always salty? Kingturtle 22:45, 20 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Answer: The lake itself was never salt water; the salt came from brine springs on the shore of the lake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.230.239.88 (talk • contribs) 3 August 2006

Second to Chernobyl??
Taken out of article, this needs references to stay in.

It is interesting to note, that neither Honeywell Corp. or the previous owners of Allied Chemical Co. were fined by the federal gov't or any of its bureaus. The lake, second only to Chernobyl in terms of toxicity, is unusable by all but the most ignorant of locals. Claims of clean-up and pollution reduction are lies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poorpete (talk • contribs) 1 July 2006

Updated info on the cleanup operations
Via Syracuse.com, for anyone who wants to add it in: http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2015/06/whats_going_on_with_onondaga_lake_cleanup_now_that_dredging_is_over.html#incart_m-rpt-1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.168.151.102 (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

More updates on cleanup
I've been working on updating the Chemical pollution and Chemical pollution cleanup with more recent information. I updated the tenses in the Chemical pollution section to reflect the completion of the cleanup, as well as in the cleanup section. I also added more info on the cleanup, as the EPA has since released its first 5-year report. I've got a working draft in a sandbox, and here is a link to the diff describing all the changes. Can anyone weigh in and help me review it to ensure it's suitable for Wikipedia?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 21:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 19:01, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback! I also discussed these edits with DASonnefeld, who supports them as well. Would you mind implementing these changes? I try to avoid making these edits myself given my COI.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the timely updates. Further comments, corrections, edits welcome. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:10, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Further updates needed (Museums)
The section on Museums would benefit from updating and expansion. The Skä•noñh Center – Great Law of Peace Center now is in operation. And an updated section could also include information about the two Visitor Centers:


 * Skä•noñh Center
 * Griffin Visitor Center
 * Honeywell Visitors Center

DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Article scope?
I wonder what the ideal scope of this article might be. There's almost enough material here to spin off one or two separate articles, e.g.:


 * History of Onondaga Lake
 * Onondaga Lake cleanup

Comments, suggestions welcome. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:31, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 03:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)