Talk:Operating model

Inaccurate and Uncited Operating Model Definition
The definition of operating models in the first sentence is not cited. Quite frankly, it is not aligned with industry Business Architecture standards such as the Business Architecture Body of Knowledge (BIZBOK) Guide. The definition suggest that value delivery to the customer is part of an operating model. Value delivery is realized via a value stream and the value proposition it delivers to the customer. Value Streams are a key element in business architecture. However, the BIZBOK Guide make clear distinctions between Business Architecture and Operating Models. Business Architecture is strategically-oriented. Operating models are operational and resource oriented so the suggestion that operating models include value delivery to the customer is incorrect. The definition of operating models needs to be re-defined. Navy Brownshoe (talk) 04:06, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Original Research
While a great deal of the discussion on this page appears to be derived from Ross and Weill, there is considerable content that does not. This page appears to have some original research on it. I am concerned that it does not meet Wikipedia standards prohibiting original research. Nickmalik (talk) 17:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

The article has not been cleaned up since I added the comment above. I went ahead and tagged it for references and for general improvement. Nickmalik (talk) 01:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

beware of Link Spam
Removed "further reading" section due to WP:LINKSPAM Please do not add links to material that is not citable in Wikipedia, especially if it has not been referenced in the article itself. Citations to published works are fine. Nickmalik (talk) 07:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)