Talk:Operation Green Sea

Ture
Ture was not an objective to the Portuguese troops! That was the guinean dissidents goal! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.189.219.225 (talk) 20:14, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Some references removed
I removed all references that used www.westafrik.com in the URL because that domain is no longer a source of news. PYRRHON  talk   03:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Brazil
I would like to know the source for naming Brazil as an ally with the PAIGC. The only reference to this appears in the infobox and nowhere else in the article. What's the source for this? RV 12:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Green Sea Operation → Operation Green Sea — Typical English, and supported by a search at Google Books. Srnec (talk) 02:17, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Support 'Operation Green Sea' yields significantly more and better ghits walk victor falktalk 05:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Ok, it seems fine to me. Unobjectionable (talk) 12:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.historyofnations.net/africa/guinea.html
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Victory
How can this be a Portuguese victory when they failed their objectives 2.99.62.234 (talk) 17:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)