This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Temperance and Prohibition, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Temperance and ProhibitionWikipedia:WikiProject Temperance and ProhibitionTemplate:WikiProject Temperance and ProhibitionTemperance and Prohibition articles
Cmacauley, the Shawnee Heritage books by Don Greene do not qualify as reliable sources for Wikipedia. His books are self-published genealogies that reportedly contain dubious information. We should not cite them. I'm sure you'll find enough reliable sources elsewhere for this and other similar articles. Best wishes, Kevin1776 (talk) 05:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I am aware of this. Unfortunately, no other sources are available online that contain relevant genealogical information, and I live in a rural community far from any libraries that do, nor do I have the funds to purchase such sources. But I will delete Greene from this article anyway. Cmacauley (talk) 14:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. In cases such as this, reliable genealogical information is sparse, even in the best sources, although that doesn't prevent amateur genealogists online from happily filling in the blanks with questionable information. For example, Tecumseh is the most famous Shawnee, and yet there is no reliable information about the identities of his grandparents or the names of a couple of his wives and a potential daughter. I could find alleged names for those people online, but it wouldn't be reliable information. On such matters we must be silent, alas. Kevin1776 (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
With due respect to the fact that I am just a random Johnny-come-lately in this conversation, I disagree that we must "be silent". Rather, we must place those sources appropriately. It's true that it would be incorrect to use such sources in the main article, but the Talk page is a good place to note dubious sources for the reference of other researchers, because they may well lead to reliable sources from other editors in the future. 97.102.30.205 (talk) 15:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We are in agreement. By "be silent," I mean exactly what you say, not placing the info in the article. We can and indeed should discuss dubious sources on talk pages. Kevin1776 (talk) 23:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
