Talk:Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division

Building a better article
This article was in pretty bad shape, but contained a fair amount of info -- see this revision:

Now a new editor has rewritten it, including several references that are neither inline nor online. So the article still needs a fair amount of work.

Is there cited info from the previous article that should be incorporated? Govmatters, can you add your citations inline with the new text you've added? -Pete (talk) 23:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey Pete, I just did some cleanup--I was going to drop a note at WP:ORE... Katr67 (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Eeeee! This article is off the deep end with a distorted emphasis on the agency's administrative point of view.  It really ought to focus on the external work it is supposed to do.  Further reading is excessive and there is a sentence with four citations!  —EncMstr (talk) 00:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree it needs work. FWIW, these are changes I made, including moving the pile of unfootnoted "notes and references" to a "Further reading" section and turning embedded titled external links into refs, as is my wont. Katr67 (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)