Talk:Ostromia

Article very speculative
This is a very speculative article. In my opinion you need a more complete skeleton. This should clearly marked as an assumption, not as an fact!--MBelzer (talk) 19:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

There are minor anatomical differences in other Archaeopteryx skeletons too! So you can create more new bird/dinosaur species! I hope you can understand my skepticism about this new species.--MBelzer (talk) 20:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It isn't this article that is speculative, it simply reflects the published description of the genus. FunkMonk (talk) 23:48, 18 December 2017 (UTC)