Talk:Our Home – Russia

Moving

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 15:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

The dash in such Russian phrases is properly tranlated as a form of the verb "to be". KonstKaras (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose. While the dash is indeed properly translated as a form of the verb "to be", many English-language sources do not seem to have a problem with that .—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:43, March 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * I see no dashes on that pages. Maybe, it's better to move to Our Home Russia? KonstKaras (talk) 19:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The first one uses a dash, the other three do not. My point was that many English sources simply omit the dash without translating it as "is".  Omitting the dash, however, changes the meaning somewhat, so I don't think it's a good idea to move the article to that title.  That's just my opinion, of course.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:26, March 5, 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose, I think we should not interpret the name, but translate it, and I see no reason to "translate" a dash as "is". — Nightstallion 23:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Support Our Home Russia. --Checco (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.