Talk:Out of Sight

Fair use rationale for Image:OutOfSight.jpg
Image:OutOfSight.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Out of Sight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060524213142/http://www.calendarlive.com:80/movies/reviews/cl-movie980625-5,0,6661507.story to http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/reviews/cl-movie980625-5,0,6661507.story

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

"We'd need a source but ..."
Just watched this on iplayer for the first time in many years. It occurred to me that the Wall Street guy's loss of his toupee in jail might have been a reference to the junk bond king Michael Milken. I'm not suggesting that what Milken may or may not have done (and he's since been pardoned) is linked to what Ripley the Wall Street guy in the film is supposed to have done (acquired a bank by marriage then sold off chunks of it in a dishonest way, I think it was supposed to be), nor does the film say so directly. It was just, I think, using the loss of his toupee as a trope for "dodgy but immensely rich Wall Street guy in jail" which audiences would have "got" and giggled at in the Nineties. I guess we'd need to find a review from the time.Paulturtle (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)