Talk:Padua College (Brisbane)

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland / Education C‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Padua College (Brisbane) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Padua College (Brisbane) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Deletion of important info[edit]

Clearly the house competition is an important event for the college. It is covered every year in the school bulletin, i.,e verifiable information, too. Nevertheless Discospinster (talk · contribs) insists on deletion it from the article without presenting any arguments. It is not some pissing contest trivia: it is all-school official event. Of course it is not World Peace or Save Amazon Forest, but perfectly notable within the context of the current article. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure the school bulletin covers a lot of things, but that doesn't mean these things belong in an encyclopedia article. Neither does a list of valedictorians, or who won the school's free-throw contest. This is the type of thing that fits in with what not to include in school articles. ... discospinster _talk 01:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please read my argument: it is not a minor event; nor it is an individual honored by school. It is a major event for the school, specific for the scool. And no, it is not covered by WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI: in is not a "short-term event", nor it is OR, nor trivia (such as bell schedule), nor ""excessive amount", nor... (if I am mistaken please indicate which item and we may discuss.). At the same time, I agree that the list of winners is an unnecessary detail; removed. I hope you agree that a single sentence remained will not overburden the article. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

seriously lacking citations[edit]

This article has very few citations to support the information presented. It's at a point where deleting the information is likely to occur. If you care about the content in this article, please add citations. Kerry (talk) 00:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]