Talk:Paestum

Untitled
I have not disturbed the existing text, but have added a section describing the more major buildings in some detail--Anthony.bradbury 19:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Temple dedicated to Apollo?
I added the citation needed template for the statements concerning the dedication to Apollo, appearing to me almost unique in the literature and worth of a specific reference.--Filos96 23:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

On the site an explanation says that the temple erroneously attributed to Neptune (second temple of Hera) is actually a temple of Apollo in his role of a healer.46.5.253.24 (talk) 20:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

another illustration for "rediscovery"?
From the Met. Haven't uploaded to Commons yet because there will be a bulk upload at some point. —Luis (talk) 21:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Fully protected
Time to stop reverting and start discussing ... &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

I'm happy with it in its current form. I can't see any possible justification him or others breaching the NPOV policy by inserting his own personal opinion which is of course irrelevant. After all, "Wikipedia should not take a view as to whether an event was fortunate or not and "WP:NPOV is non-negotiable, and the principles upon which it is based cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, nor by editor consensus." doesn't seem to leave much doubt. 120.17.171.85 (talk) 18:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)