Talk:Pakistan in the war on terror

Uncited and sourcing
I have reverted the insertion of a great deal of uncited and badly sourced content, please refrain from reinserting it until sourcing is found. The Last Angry Man (talk) 11:38, 26 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Would the two users who continue to revert unsourced content into this article stop doing so. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)


 * You should stop blanking the whole article which even if at places might not have inline citations or deadlinks, the article War in North-West Pakistan has most of that information. Also the content that is verifiable is treated with tags and not article blanking. You instead choose to editwar over it instead of discussing here knowing that you are not getting a consensus to remove it. --lTopGunl (talk) 11:50, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Consensus is not required to follow policy you muppet. Stop reverting unsourced content into the article in violation of policy. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Consensus is required for all content decisions. If you make a personal attack again, your wikilawyering will not do you any good. You are being reverted here by more than one editor, that means there is a dispute which needs addressing and your mere POV. There's a purpose for the tags which is served when the content is either sourced in other places or easily verifiable. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you start a drive to blank articles all over. --lTopGunl (talk) 11:59, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I call a spade a spade you are a muppet. Continue to revert unsourced content into the article against policy will be reported. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Consider this your last warning for that purpose. WP:SPADE is for content or vandals (if you can differentiate between those and content disputes) and is no reason to comment on other editors. You are the one who's on brink of WP:3RR here. Another revert will get you a block, esp. in light of your personal attacks and failing to discuss the content. --lTopGunl (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Enough with the reverts- I've protected the article. Try to get a consensus here.--Slon02 (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Pakistan's role in the War on Terror. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080516014922/http://www.thenews.com.pk:80/print1.asp?id=59395 to http://www.thenews.com.pk/print1.asp?id=59395

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Source not strong enough for statement.
The following statement was based on unverified sources (In the article referenced, it says, "CanWest News Service yesterday could not independently verify Mr. Saifullah's comments, and the district leader did not provide any direct evidence to prove the allegations.") therefore I have moved it from the main article to the talk section (WP:EXCEPTIONAL applies):

Thanks to Kautilya3 (talk) for Suggestion --Todualable (talk) 01:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Todualable