Talk:Palestinian Premier League

Easton Cowboys, Bristol
Does anyone know which team(s) the Easton Cowboys played against? It was probably a team not in this league. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 16:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Why not look on their website, where they give details of their Palestine tour, with several relevant articles? RolandR (talk) 17:31, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and I must admit that I'd not found those. But that's because I was seeking secondary sources. This article seems to be cross-posted on this blog, but that wouldn't qualify as a reliable source. I'll s'pose they'll probably do for further info if there's no independent commentary available. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 20:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Reference and bias tags
This article needs in-line citations for its many assertions. Biased statements like "a rich history stretching back to the early 1930s" and "Israeli occupation" need to be edited. --Fang Aili talk 18:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Why? It's perhaps OTT to suggest "a rich history", but it shouldn't be unreasonable to accept that there were clubs playing football in Palestine in the 1930s. Likewise "Israeli occupation"; it's well documented that the Israeli occupation of the West Bank caused/causes restrictions on travel of the sort that would disrupt football in the country, let alone the destruction to property and infrastructure. 138.251.239.171 (talk) 04:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Founded
It wasn't founded in 2010. It should include previous season winners. Even if not preofessional, the league was known under this name. -Koppapa (talk) 10:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Political Biases
Suggesting the West Bank Premier League has a rich history dating to the 1930s is a biased, upsupported claim, meant to have a strong political sentiment of Palestinian nationality, which is very contoversial. In the 1930s only Jewish clubs were active. As http://www.pfa.ps/ is currently down, I have to support my claims on the Hebrew and English versions of this page and articles I found on google. It is of paramount importance that wikipedia remain neutral and present facts. I ask moderators that if the current version is to be edited, all historical claims in the article (and especially in the introduction, the part of the page 95% of users read exclusively) would be verified with independent sources, and information to be would be presented in an unbiased manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.139.115.57 (talk) 18:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC)