Talk:Panaeolina

Hallucinogens
There isn't any citation for the section about the false positive. Has there been some study published about it? Leefkrust22 (talk) 00:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Also under 'Notable species', it is said that Panaeolina foenisecii "very rarely contains psilocybin". But I thought all the results claiming any Panaeolina genus mushroom contained psilocybin was a false positive? Surely even a very rare occurrence conflicts with that sentence, seeing as it is worded so absolutely. I will place 'Citation needed' tags on each statement until one is cited as true, disproving the other which can then be removed. Gul e (talk) 18:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, I decided to change the text to "thought to be false positives" and cited a page with lots of research to support this. I also removed the statement that Panaeolina foenisecii "very rarely contains psilocybin". It is uncited and I can see no solid research to support this. I believe it is unlikely to be true and in any case it would be unnecessary to write it there. Gul e (talk) 18:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)