Talk:Pandigital number

Too complicated
This is unneccesarily complex. Could the author, or someone who understands what is being discussed simplify the text. Thanks,  Theonlyedge 21:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Could you be a little more specific as to what makes you think the article is "unneccesarily complex"? I know summation notation (mathematical formulas using the Greek letter &Sigma;) can look scary to some people, but I thought that the listing of actual pandigital numbers (12345678900, 12345678901, etc.) made the concept more understandable, and I actually worried that the ideas might be so simple and obvious as to appear condescending. PrimeFan 22:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * i think Theonlyedge probly read a random paragraph in the middle, or fixated on that compilcated looking formula and said "too complex". If you read hte article from the begining, its "too simple"! Numerao 23:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

This is honestly retarded. This is like saying a straight in poker is mathamatically important. AtrusRand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.88.251.198 (talk) 09:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

- Error in number 987654521, should be 987654321 - The number 1234567890 does NOT have all digits in order (unless you mean modulo 10). 84.196.254.9 (talk) 12:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)