Talk:Papuk

Merge discussion
I believe it would be beneficial to merge Papuk Geopark to this article as the Geopark covers bulk of the mountain and such a move would allow a better presentation of information abouth both topics. In addition, the article could present information about Papuk Nature Park in a systematic method. Similar arrangement exists for Velebit where nature park information is integrated and Plitvice Lakes. If and when sufficiently substantial material is added on the nature park or the geopark standalone articles may be warranted, but presently much of the information is two existing articles is repeated.

Furthermore it might also be wise to add Ravna Gora (mountain) to this article since Ravna Gora is not considered a separate mountain by geographers, but a part of Papuk - as noted in the Ravna Gora article itself.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)