Talk:Parshvanatha/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 14:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Opening statement
In reviews I conduct, I may make small copyedits. These will only be limited to spelling and punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. For replying to Reviewer comment, please use ✅,, , ❌, , or , followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. — ♠Vami _IV†♠  14:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello? You there? I started reviewing this article 11 days ago, and I'm wondering if you missed the automated bot message informing you. – ♠Vami _IV†♠  11:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . I did miss the bot message. Thanks for starting the GA review. Will fix all your points soon. Capankajsmilyo(Talk 18:07, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Lead

 * There should be a link to Dharma in Jainism in the text (ford-makers or propagators of dharma)
 * He was the earliest exponent of Karma philosophy in the recorded history. Which recorded history?
 * [...] whereas historians point that he [...] Point out?
 * Digambaras disagree with Śvētāmbara interpretations. Redundant, remove.
 * Done Capankajsmilyo(Talk 00:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Style

 * There are instances of both "BC" and "BCE".
 * Done Capankajsmilyo(Talk 00:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Jain biography
There are terms and pieces of information in this section that, as a Westerner with little grasp on Indian religion, escape me with just the article alone. Ideally, the article prose would introduce or explain these; examples of this would be the tirthankaras, which are explained, but in parentheses (replace these with a comma; it is best to use parentheses sparingly and for notes like these, which provide small details). Others, like what Indras are, are not explained.
 * – ♠Vami _IV†♠  00:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Colossal statues
Expand this section. There are six sentences - one without citation - in this section, none of which detail why or how Jains build these statues, or trace their creation through history.
 * Hi Capankajsmilyo, Citation is added for the sentence with missing citation. Pratyk321

Status query
Vami IV, Capankajsmilyo, it has been over a month since anything was posted to this page or to the article. Where does this nomination stand, and will there be any progress soon? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)