Talk:Paula Garcés

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biography[edit]

Somebody just added a lot of biographical material without citing in any sources. It would be good if we could get a cite on that stuff. -- MisterHand 03:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, thats why I added the dubious tag. It says she was born in Colombia, but she is listed as an American actress...HMMM!Jmlk17 12:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too much personal information about young daughter Skye. Listing her school is completely and utterly irresponsible much less relevant to this bio.

Picture[edit]

Anyone got a free picture of her? It's a shame to not be able to have any picture of her. -Mike Payne (talk - contribs) 14:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh you have got to be freaking joking me... there is no goddamn way that picture is really her. That is the WORST photoshop I have ever seen in my entire life.

THIS image would be much better:

http://www.buddytv.com/articles/the-shield/images/paula-garces-2.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.188.152.6 (talk) 06:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Shield[edit]

The Shield has one more season before it ends, so how can her contract be extended for three more seasons? --Moly 18:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Fix needed[edit]

Wikipedia should almost never include the word "currently" and should avoid other words like "now" or "recently" should be avoided when trying to write for an encyclopedia. Please read WP:RELTIME for further details.

An encyclopedia should not be vague. An encyclopedia is not a news source and so information should be clear and specific. If the time is important then it should be specified. So instead of saying an actor is "currently" in a show, you should write an actor is in a show "since 2014". Or the time reference should be removed entirely. Please fix, and please unlock the article, or at least set to edits requiring review. -- 109.77.234.59 (talk) 12:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got the one infraction of WP:DATED that you were alluding to. I don't know the history of the protection on the article, so I can't speak to that. Thanks for your help! Dismas|(talk) 17:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]