Talk:Pawnee Zoo/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: JulieSpaulding (talk) 09:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Hunter, I'll be reviewing this article. I'll be going through the problems I spot semi-haphazardly, so bear with me...

I know it's nit-picky, but I'm willing to pass this article right away as soon as these issues are fixed. JulieSpaulding (talk) 10:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) You might like to reference the plot section. If you don't want to cite the Pawnee Zoo episode itself, at least cite a show recap.
 * 2) *I know you know this now, but WP:TVMOS doesn't require citations for plot summaries. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) In the first paragraph of the section 'Production', a weasel word appears in the phrase 'Commentators suggested...' and in the sentence before that also. Exactly who suggested that?
 * 4) *Actually, there's no reason to use that wording in this case anyway. I simply dropped the weasel words and changed it to say that the penguin marriage mirrored the real life one. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) The word 'said' is used 20 times in the Reception section. I would probably vary my statements like this:
 * Critic A commented that Poehler's character appeared too cheery, but Critic B viewed this as a mere statement of her individuality.
 * I dropped some of the "said"s. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Is the use of the word 'literally' in the last sentence of the 'Plot' section necessary?
 * 2) *Dropped it. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * JulieSpaulding (talk) 11:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * JulieSpaulding (talk) 11:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * JulieSpaulding (talk) 11:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)