Talk:People of South Ossetia for Peace

bad sources

 * not WP:RS imho.--A20080819 (talk) 11:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

pov tag
The whole article features Georgian POV, e.g.:
 * 1) secessionist government - officially recognized by UN members;
 * 2) main opposition party and political movement - any additional info on a number of persons that form "amin oppositional party" - 5? 6?
 * 3) to put an end to Kokoity regime - do you feel Saakashvili's regime would outlast Kokoity?
 * 4) which maintains its pro-Russian and separatist stance - how can a government of a recognized independent state have any "separatist stance"?
 * 5) conduct alternative elections where Georgians and Ossetians alike could participate as equal voters (unlike secessionist elections which did not include Georgian population of South Ossetia). - any additional info on how comes ethnic Georgian population was "not included" - by whom? The whole ethnos? Officially citizens of SO, were they just "not included", based on their ethnicity?
 * 6) the ‘alternative polls’ informed that ex-South Ossetian prime minister Dimitri Sanakoev was elected as an alternative "President" of the region - how can a poll be organized by the "movement" or a "party"?
 * 7) What the hell does the alternative "President" thing means? Why is it "President" in quotes? Does Georgia recognizes Sanakoev a President - of what? (Does Georgia recognize South Ossetia as an administrative entity? - no).
 * 8) Several attacks on the houses of its members have also been reported. - attacks by whom? where? when? who was attacked? in what way? who reported it? etc... FeelSunny (talk) 09:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * To answer these questions you should read more, not just play with tags. As for a fairy-tale about a recognized independent state, you can share it with your fellow brainwashed countrymen. You can hardly find anyone in the world more or less interested in the Caucasus who believes in this "independence". --KoberTalk 15:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * this is a typical georgian nationalist-style responce. next time try to answer these questions before correcting article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.182.51.149 (talk) 18:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC)