Talk:Persuasion/Archives/2018

Article Evaluation
I believe this article is very well-written and excellently summarizes the topic. I think the organization of the contents makes sense and allows readers to easily follow along. Additionally, the article's lack of esoteric terminology helps laymen understand and appreciate persuasion without sacrificing any level of depth or significant understanding. The "Theories" section appears to stand alone and seems disjointed from the written material before and after this part. A brief, two-sentence introduction would solve this issue. Additionally, the "In Culture" section can use greater elaboration to help relate to more relevant and pertinent issues in today's society. With "Fake News" and other reoccurring media themes, there is room for editors to offer more topical examples in this important and relatable section. Umdtourguide (talk) 03:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)