Talk:Peter the Iberian

Untitled
What is the "well known theory" that Peter was the pseudo-Dionysius? ThePeg 17:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of my research
Hi, I have done a little research about the Saint and I see that somebody has reverted my edits without any explanation. It is really irritating when somebody just deletes your research. Giglia (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi. This is a common problem on Wikipedia. So, you should watch the article closely. Strangely enough, I found that this page was not on my watchlist although I have also edited it and its subject is within the scope of my interest. :)--KoberTalk 16:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Chalcedonian POV
To say "he is also recognized by various eastern Churches, some of which have deviated from the Orthodox doctrine" in indication that the Non-Chalcedonian churches are not orthodox is a clear violation of NPOV. I am going to change the wording to "from the Chalcedonian doctrine". If anyone objects, please speak up. Deusveritasest (talk) 01:17, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I changed his religion status from "Georgian Orthodox Church" to "Miaphysite Christianity" as he was, by all(?) scholarly and historical accounts, anti-Chalcedonian. -Anonymous

Image of Peter the Iberian
Are you sure this is the image of peter the Iberian because the writings in the image are Armenian. I'm gonna be nice and not delete it but find the correct image of Peter the Iberian or explain why their is Armenian writings in this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArmenianbyDNA (talk • contribs) 05:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)