Talk:Peterotica

GA Nomination

 * 1) Well Written [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|25px]]
 * Written in Prose, spelling and grammar are fine.
 * Has decent lead section, is well laid out and doesn't read in an "in-universe" style
 * 1) Factually Accurate and Verifiable [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|25px]]
 * Contains no OR, is accurate and sourced appropriately. Sources are reliable with no use of blogs/fansites.
 * 1) Broad in coverage [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|25px]]
 * Covers the main plot and production details well. Does not diverge into discussion of wider areas.
 * 1) Neutral [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|25px]]
 * 2) Stable [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|25px]]
 * Well maintained with no edit wars or frequent reversions
 * 1) Images [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|25px]]
 * uses one appropriate image which is sourced and copyright available.

I review this article as a pass for GA status. Well done, perhaps the nominator may like to review an article now? -- Brideshead (leave a message) 11:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)