Talk:Philippe Vandenberg

Review
, you're an expert in art, according to List of reviewers by subject, so I think it would be best if you reviewed it. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 19:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I see. I am currently occupied at the moment with other business, but I'll take care to look at this article when time permits. However, at first glance of this article, I notice two major issues: 1. Overly long lists for Selected Exhibitions and Selected Bibliography; it would do both reviewers and readers some good if the writer of the article (presumably a better expert in Mr. Vandenberg than myself) were to simplify the lists into a briefer bullet points and descriptions of Vandenberg's work. 2. The biography is unimaginatively divided into numerous sections of rather small size. It would do the article good if these sections were condensed and the section titles given more descriptive names. In my opinion, I believe these issues should be rectified in order for the article to provide the reader with a clear and easy-to-read picture Mr. Vandenberg's indubitably prolific career. It will also be beneficial if the article were to examine some of Vandenberg's most significant works and elaborate objectively on how they contribute to the artist's notability. I'll leave this advice for you and any other editors to consider while I try and finish my other endeavors. My deepest apologies for not being able to give this article a serious and lengthy review and edit at the moment, GeneralPoxter (talk) 21:03, 28 May 2020 (UTC)