Talk:Phylogenetic inertia

Dowen's Peer Review
Homologous structures is a sub-heading below the ones above it. Not sure if that's intentional or not. I feel like it should be the same level of sub-heading as body plan and modes of reproduction.

Also, I think that you can take the bullet points out, they should be read as like a chapter in an encyclopedia. But if it's how you want your page to look like, I think that that's also valid.

Link Eigenvector page for the eigenvector regression. I think that would help understand that a little.

Maybe add more pictures from the papers you read, especially in the section that you talk about those papers. show the phylogeny they came up with.

Djocson (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Paige's review
Maybe add a photo in the first section, there are a lot of words and the photos in the other sections look really nice.

For the last section on tests, I think it may flow better if you discuss the comparative analyses first and then discuss the controversies

If you can add more examples under the modes of reproduction and the homologous structures, that may be helpful

Well done!!

Beezing (talk) 03:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)