Talk:PiHKAL

Merge with Shulgin Rating Scale
I am fully against this because they are clearly separate entities in their own right. It is of no relevance that the scale was mentioned in PiHKAL.  Tu rk ey ph an t 14:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

My Opinion I think that a easy-to-find link to the Rating Scale in every Shulgin's related page is enough for understanding how the effects are described by Alexander. Eric Castagna, --190.48.204.222 21:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Title
The correct title of these books are PIHKAL and TIHKAL, with the "I" capitalized. Can we move the articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.54.201.38 (talk) 17:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

PEA
This section needs some work, I think. Aside from the fact that none of it is cited, much of it comes across as POV ("supplement of the gods"). It also contains inappropriate speculation (e.g. hypothesizing why Shulgin considers PEA to be without effect). Finally, what exactly PEA is is never mentioned. I don't possess the requisite knowledge to bring this section up to snuff; hopefully someone who does will be able to give it the improvements it needs. El Whizzo (talk) 09:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Links in compound table
If somebody has a lot of time / nifty tools, the links to chemical pages may be added in the table (the pages can be found in the navbox). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.158.90.245 (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)