Talk:Pipestone National Monument

Extra image
Another image if the article gets bigger or if someone prefers this one. --Calton | Talk 12:18, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

Cannomok'e?
I found this landmark listed under "Cannomok'e--Pipestone National Monument" in the National Register. I searched for "Cannomok'e" on the web, and found no hits except for National Register related references. Does anyone know the story behind it? — Eoghanacht  talk 19:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Inaccurate Information - Paragraph 3
Hello,

I am a current park ranger at Pipestone National Monument and it has come to my attention that the Wikipedia page for this park contains inaccurate information. In the third paragraph of this article, I suggest replacing the sentence:

"Today only Indigenous people from 23 tribal nations, with treaties with the National Park Service, are allowed to quarry the pipestone."

with the following information:

"Any enrolled member of a federally recognized American Indian tribe may apply for a free quarry permit to dig for the pipestone. The National Park Service regularly consults with representatives from 23 affiliated tribal nations to discuss land management practices, historic preservation, exhibit design, and other facets of the park's management."

165.83.160.249 (talk) 22:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Crow Creek Reservation paragraph
This paragraph seems out of place in this article. The Crow Creek Reservation is in central South Dakota. The only referenced source for this paragraph (a self-published blog) makes no mention of the Pipestone quarry in the text; it only appears on a map as a point along the route of the wagon train. That's not a significant enough connection to warrant inclusion in this article. Does anyone object to the removal of this paragraph? Skimpburger (talk) 00:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Furthermore, the WP article on the Crow Creek Reservation makes no mention of the story related in this paragraph. If it belongs anywhere, it belongs in that article and not this one. Skimpburger (talk) 00:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * You should go ahead and move it to the correct article. oncamera  (talk page) 02:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)