Talk:Powdery mildew

=Photo Description Incorrect=

The third photo down is described as 'spider mites at high magnification'. These aren't spider mites, nor do they really resemble spider mites IMO. I wouldn't call that 'high magnification' either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.183.199 (talk) 07:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Notice of import
A copy of this article was moved to wikibooks using the Import tool (with all revisions). If this article was marked for copy to wikibooks or as containing how-to sections, it can now be safely rewritten.

If contributors are interested in expanding on the practical information that was in this article, please do so on the wikibooks side. For pointers on writing wikibooks, see Wikibooks:Wikibooks for Wikipedians. -- SB_Johnny |talk|books 15:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

No need to merge
I see no need to merge the articles of Erysiphales and Powdery mildew! The first one is a biological order and the other one is a disease caused by species belonging to that order. There are also separate articles for common cold and rhinoviruses for the same reason.

This one is a horticulture article, the other one is a mycology article. Kaarel 20:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Spelling mistake on image
Hi. Does anyone out there have the skills to correct the typo on the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Downy_and_Powdery_mildew_on_grape_leaf.JPG? Best regards, Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 13:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Photo of powdery mildew
Whilst the photo of powdery mildew on the Wikipedia page is not wrong it is hugely atypical. The symptoms shown are extremely unusual and very misleading for the casual observer.

Phil Taylor — Preceding unsigned comment added by hj83.244.173.35 (talk) 11:46, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Article Evaluation
Significant information in each category could be more in depth and precise with factual reasonings. I think either a scientific previous studies section should be added or descriptions of previous studies under each of the individual plants listed in the article. Reliable sources are needed for some statements throughout the article so plagiarism isn't a possibility at hand.. Also, there is a misspelling of the word soybean, spelled as "soyabean" on this image https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powdery_mildew#/media/File:Powdery_Mildew_in_Soyabean_leaves.jpg Kellyn.hickle (talk) 02:43, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Cannabis
Given the fluctuating legal status of this plant in the United States, Canada and elsewhere in the so-called Western World, and the fact that it's afflicted by powdery mildew, it seems worth a mention. The value of cannabis harvests worldwide puts it well above most of the other plants on the list, and in capitalism, aren't we supposed to venerate THE ECONOMY at every turn? 2607:FEA8:BFA0:47F:6817:49F0:3E77:BCF8 (talk) 11:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ . Invasive Spices (talk) 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Conditions
Hello I assume you mistakenly reverted  assuming it was vandalism. if you could provide a source for that it would help. I have removed the source that was there because it was the wrong Huang. Years ago an editor saw an inadequate citation "Huang" and just searched for anything by "Huang" about "powdery mildew" and added it there. Years later it doesn't matter which Huang it was because any newer source would be better anyway. Invasive Spices (talk) 14 May 2022 (UTC)