Talk:Pre-ejaculate/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Image issue is ridiculous

There doesn't need to be a gallery. There needs to be a single image that illustrates without being pornographic. That's what makes it educational. That's what the current (and I believe original) image accomplishes. Other images that showcase more of the genitalia than is necessary and/or illustrate a need for grooming do not enhance this article. Lara 22:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

is the big image really necessary?

It's quite graphic and ew-inducing.--69.165.245.9 (talk) 08:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

THE PICTURE

OMG I cannot believe how many comments there have been about this picture. As a 33 year old woman in a relationship with a loving and amazing man. This image along with the written content was able to help me as a grown up, learn and understand more about a subject that caused him some embarrassment. Keep up the good work. This is factual and informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.43.126.23 (talk) 21:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't mind the pic of penis but why we have to stare at mutilated circumstanced & unnatural shaft? Pic should be all natural huh? Zazae (talk) 21:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

I've seen other articles with two images at the top, although I don't remember if they were both within the infobox or both just after it, and I I think having one image each for a circumcised and a natural penis, each with pre-ejaculate, would be appropriate educationally. Thanks! — 71.212.139.106 (talk) 22:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)