Talk:President of Rhodesia

No “vandalism”
There has never been “vandalism” by me. The revert actions by User:PaddyMatthews could rather be considered as that. So far, what was added has better academic sources and references than most of all the pages about Rhodesia. The changes are not based on a website but a long list of scientific literature. I will not “fight” with people who just check one or two sources out of dozens. I’m a scientist without the desire to continue the Rhodesian bush wars here. Either the Wikipedia community can accept that someone contributes to the best of his knowledge, or not. That’s all from my side. Keep, delete, do what you like. Facts remain facts with or without Wikipedia. University Professor for History (talk) 09:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)