Talk:Primary hyperoxaluria

Conflict of interest edit request
Iciplascarfern (talk) 21:40, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * thank you for your complete COI disclosure, due to the substantial request (some 16 items) we'll need to take a look at this slowly...will be looking over 1st point tonight, thank you --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * have taken a look at edit request 1 as well as other '15 items' I dont see logic in many of these points raised above, therefore I believe you need another editor to look at this extensive list above, good luck--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking a look Ozzie10aaaa. The reason for this extensive list is that the information in the original article was scant and not adequately sourced (even had a request for needing more citations). There has been quite more recent evidence published in this area than what the article portrays. I apologize for adding all requests at once. Is there anything I could answer for you maybe? To help understand the rationale for these requests? I totally understand if not. Thank you for your guidance. Iciplascarfern (talk) 13:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I have added #2 (signs and symptoms, marked as done in the list above) and #4 (renal→kidney, add source). The sources aren't what we consider "ideal" (e.g., we like review articles better than original research papers), but I thought that even though it would be possible to improve somewhat on it, just doing this much would be a major improvement to the article.  Thank you for posting it.  Maybe someone else could take a turn picking another one from the list.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I added #7 (description of Lumasiran - difficult to track these since the list has been edited and reformatted), marked as done above. Retswerb (talk) 02:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I have added #1, #3, #5, #7 and marked done.  Spencer T• C 02:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Per WP:MEDRS, #2 is only partially done . The last two sentences are based on primary literature and were not added. If you can provide secondary sources supporting those statements, then they can be added.  Spencer T• C 03:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * For #8, it relies on primary sources and is not done. If secondary sources can be found to back this statement, then it can be added.  Spencer T• C 03:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Added #4 with a secondary source as a reference, rather than primary literature. That should cover all of the edit requests.  Spencer T• C 04:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your edits  Spencer T• C. I have bolstered #2 and #8 with secondary sources and made changes to the text accordingly. Could you please take a look? Appreciate it. Iciplascarfern (talk) 20:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * {{u}Iciplascarfern}}, as I partially implemented #2, could you clarify any changes from the text currently in the article? I have created a new table row "2B" with the existing text, and please put your proposed changes for that text next to it. #8 looks good, so I will go ahead and add that.  Spencer T• C 20:36, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you  Spencer T• C. I have separated out the text that needs to be added to existing text. Iciplascarfern (talk) 21:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The suggested addition is very closely paraphrased to the original source (which says "...the population prevalence of the most common variant is much higher than anticipated for the documented disease frequency, suggesting either incomplete penetrance or underdiagnosis"); could you reword this? Best,  Spencer T• C 21:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Spencer T• CI have reworded the sentence. Let me know if it reads fine now. Iciplascarfern (talk) 22:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅  Spencer T• C 22:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much  Spencer T• C Iciplascarfern (talk) 13:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)