Talk:Prime Minister of Singapore

Image copyright problem with Image:Singov top 02.gif
The image Image:Singov top 02.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --01:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Corruption
Is the high pay of prime minister of Singapore a sign of corruption? Or linked to corruption or abuse of authority in any way? Vladimir Zezheng (talk) 15:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * It's his legally mandated salary, regardless of the disputes around it. High salaries are not limited to the prime minister position, and are extended across all sitting ministers, mayors and members of parliament. It's a hallmark of the Singapore civil service, with the government claiming that pegging civil servants' pay to the professional sector both attracts talent and reduces corruption. Seloloving (talk) 15:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Section 25 of the constitution
Please read Section 25 of the Constitution, where it details the role of the presidency in appointing the prime minister and the other members of the cabinet on the advice of the prime minister. Seloloving (talk) 19:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)