Talk:Priory Preparatory School

Merge
As per notability guidelines, I am proposing to merge this into the Banstead article as it is not notable enough for its own article. The only third party references are a short couple of paras on an amateur Banstead history website. Nothing notable as far as I can see. Fmph (talk) 08:14, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I thoroughly and complete'y oppose this merge proposal. No arguments in favour save yours as nominator have been advanced conce JU;y 2011. I am removing the tag Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree that a merge is not appropriate. There is already far too much encyclopaedic content. Dahliarose (talk) 23:12, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

notability
Sufficient notable alumni to render this organisation to be on the notable side of WP:GNG. Add those pt the local press mention and we have the basis for a notable article. It does rely too heavily on primary sources, but that is a criticism of the article, not the inherent notability. There is improvement to be done and more WP:RS citations to find Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)