Talk:Professional negligence in English law

Better references needed
This article appears at first read to be original research, because the only footnotes are case citations, which are primary sources, and the text itself consists largely of summaries of various court decisions, with wikilinks to articles on those decisions. The articles on the cases in turn lack any footnotes to anything other than case citations in most instances. On the other hand, there is a list of references to scholarly secondary reliable sources which I presume are the actual sources for the text of this article, but because there are not in-line citations, it is difficult, if not impossible to verify what they are being referenced for. Clearly the article is notable, but it needs to be rewritten based on those secondary sources rather than on original research, with appropriate inline citation to those sources. Banks Irk (talk) 17:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)