Talk:Progressive Change Campaign Committee

POV, partisan article
As an editor of eight years on Wikipedia, I must point out that this article is blatantly partisan, extremist, inaccurate, outdated and triumphalist in nature. That is why I have made the edits and added tags to the article in an attempt to bring it into line with this online encyclopaedia. Please read the following to help in creating and editing Wikipedia: WP:The five pillars of Wikipedia, WP:How to edit a page, and WP:Simplified Manual of Style.

Whoever is editing this page: please keep in mind that OR, POV and non-neutral language is not acceptable and subject to rewriting or, in drastic cases, deletion, to ensure the integrity of this encyclopaedia. and edit-warring and violations of 3RR may result in blocking if the rules and regulations regarding editing on Wikipedia are ignored or flagrantly disrespected. Yours, Quis separabit?  03:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

why is this tag still here?
the claim is that the article is "blatantly partisan, extremist, inaccurate, outdated and triumphalist in nature."

PCCC is a political organization,of course there will be partisan language... that's the point.
 * Not on wikipedia. Quis separabit?  23:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

as for the other stuff, it just seems to be a list of accomplishments for the kinds of work that they do.

is that why its labeled triumphalist ?

because they have has these accomplishments?

curious readers want to know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.64.117 (talk) 22:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


 * No -- but because this article, which was created almost entirely by copying/pasting from the organization's own (necessarily biased) website, is outdated, dishonestly incomplete and entirely POV in nature. That's why. Quis separabit?  23:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * And the deformation of the term "progressive" (which refers to individuals such as Teddy Roosevelt, Fiorello LaGuardia, and William Proxmire), and not to the leftwing partisan agitprop used by the PCCC, is a tragedy. Those who thinks teachers' unions, the New York City Council, the Obama administration, etc. are "progressive" institutions are indeed as ignorant as their grammar above would indicate. Quis separabit?  23:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


 * This last talk comment tells you everything you need to know about this editor's intentions. Trying to redefine what "progressive" means for the rest of us readers and using inflammatory language and insults is not helpful. This user was already banned for contravening Wikipedia's rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by STEVEN (talk • contribs) 16:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Re-editing
Revert part of a recent edit rv as unnecessary name dropping and other cruft. Quis separabit? 02:04, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

DISPUTE RESOLUTION
@NatalieCD -- we are going to have to resolve our dispute or it will have to be handled for us. Quis separabit? 14:51, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Progressive Change Campaign Committee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404222707/http://www.theaapc.org/downloads/Pollies/2012/2012_AAPC_Pollie_WinnersBook_WEB.pdf to http://www.theaapc.org/downloads/Pollies/2012/2012_AAPC_Pollie_WinnersBook_WEB.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131208181749/http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20130827/fort-greene/pro-development-pac-donation-causes-bad-blood-35th-district-race to http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20130827/fort-greene/pro-development-pac-donation-causes-bad-blood-35th-district-race

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)