Talk:Pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism

= Discussion =
 * Couldn't this be put into some layman's terms? Readers shouldn't have to click this and that link to figure it out. --ArtifexCrastinus 06:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

...This article's too technical for most people. Viet&#124;Pham (talk) 14:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

...I find it to be clear and easily understandable. I don't know what there is that's so confusing about this article. Maybe you people should just read slower. I mean no disrespect, but it's in pretty lame terms already. This article could very easily be made more confusing. 69.15.31.131 (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)R.Sims69.15.31.131 (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I'd agree that it's a bit unintelligible, and I'll try to clean it up as I go. It's a complicated topic with not a lot of recent or hard information. Keep on truckin' Cpt ricard (talk) 22:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

...Should the terms "mother", "father", and the pronouns used in the article be updated to terms more inclusive? Such as replacing the usage of he/him pronouns with they/them? Tysdrawkcab (talk) 04:42, 20/05/2024 (UTC)