Talk:Public Religion Research Institute

Not public data?
I don't see the public datasets. Looks like there's a fee to view the data. Article should be corrected. --74.202.39.3 (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Promotional content
The article has been tagged for almost 7 years because of promotional content, I removed this content, but User:Studio34designs has replaced it without the addition of sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


 * they've been blocked. "16:33, 13 March 2019 The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk | contribs | block) blocked Studio34designs (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) "  Doug Weller  talk 16:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Bibliography moved from article space
Books:

Selected articles:
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alternative URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/theological-roots-white-supremacy-120007153.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ɱ (talk • contribs) 15:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Bad source
The community has listed this article as badly sourced, with the poll having very low poll numbers, polling 300 people out of sometimes hundreds of thousands of people in one state is not nearly enough polling data, plus it gives dishonest and skewed results. I vote we disuse this source as it's a piss poor survey. Additionally, there is a notability issue in general with PRRI according to their Wiki page. There are too many flaws. Lmharding (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @Lmharding What source? Where do you get the stuff about dishones/skewed results? I've removed the old notices as no longer applicable. I see no notability issue and presume you haven't actually looked for sources. as you mention only the article page.  Doug Weller  talk 15:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Even if the notability tag were relevant here, tags on Wikipedia articles are not a measure of a source's reliability. It looks like you removed this source from a bunch of articles and were reverted. A good next step would be to seek consensus on PRRI's reliability at WP:RSN. This isn't a particularly good place to discuss it. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

I was referring to prri.org. According to data lists behind the polls available only up to 300 people are polled out of tens of thousands or more populating each state leading to skewed rigged results. Going to the reliable source perennial.Lmharding (talk) 18:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @Lmharding snd yet they are used by reliable sources. What are your sources for their being skewed and dishonest? Doug Weller  talk 18:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)