The film passes criteria 2 of Wikipedia:Notability_(films)#General_principles : Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release. The movie has coverage on websites of several well-respected organisations including NY Times . --Roaring Siren (talk) 14:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are misquoting. Criterion 2 states: "The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following:". This movie definitely isn't historically notable. It's a moot point, since a capsule review, even in the New York Times, doesn't count as "non-trivial". Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not every film in wikipedia is "historically notable". What exactly is missing in the article ?. --Roaring Siren (talk) 15:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
