Talk:Quaid-e-Azam Solar Park

Missleading sentence
I deleted a missleading sentence, bcause it was completely rubbish. Claiming, that a 100 MWp solar power plant doesn't produce 100 MW on average an that therefore the plant doesn't work as it should, because the average is only 18 MW, can only be explained by utter ignorance. No solar power plant does, not even close. And no other powerplant does either. In fact, the figures provided in the article are clear. The expected production was 153 GWh per 100 MW, which is about 17.4 MW on average. So the claim, ist should be 100 MW is clearly wrong. Andol (talk) 00:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

good Shoaibghafar (talk) 19:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Quaid-e-Azam Solar Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160311153117/http://en.tbeaenergy.com/ to http://en.tbeaenergy.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

true Shoaibghafar (talk) 19:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Known by another name
In researching Zonergy I found a contract to build 1000 MW solar facility in Bahawalpur Solar Power Park. Searching around it appears Zonergy refers to this location as Bahawalpur Solar Power Park, but Pakistan refers to the location as Quaid-e-Azam Solar Park. I am too new, can we include a search for "Bahawalpur Solar Power Park" to redirect here? I'm going to keep learning, but I didn't want to forget the original reason I dove into this rabbit hole. Dr Duvak (talk) 18:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Yes Shoaibghafar (talk) 19:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC)