Talk:Quantum machine learning

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wadams3, Dbaror. Peer reviewers: Moonunit42, Jfailla1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2020 and 23 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Afk2231, Zpopovych. Peer reviewers: SladeWillson, AsherJ22.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

"Connected contributor" tag
I'm not sure if I understand this cleanup tag here. Do any of this article's authors have an apparent conflict of interest? Jarble (talk) 01:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)


 * See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics/Archive September 2018. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The cleanup tag says that "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." - but in this case, the subject is "Quantum machine learning", and there is nothing wrong with that. It is perhaps not OK to use one's own work as a source, but if it's wrong, it's wrong regardless of whether one has a close connection with the subject or not. That's why I don't like the use of the COI template in cases like these: its wording is misleading. GregorB (talk) 16:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * This article's was written by many contributors; who is accused of having a conflict of interest here? Jarble (talk) 18:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * See link above. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposing Split
As far as I can see, there are two different things being talked about in this article at the moment. There's machine learning on quantum computers (section 1), and classical machine learning for quantum mechanics problems (section 2). I'd suggest that the former stay as Quantum machine learning (since it's the more common use for the phrase), and the latter move to Quantum machine learning (physics). Thoughts? ArguMentor (talk) 11:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I agree with the split, but Quantum machine learning (physics) seems more ambiguous than, say, Machine learning in quantum physics or a similar analog. 205.175.118.118 (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I agree with the split, and that Machine learning in quantum physics is a good choice for the new article. Maybe Machine learning of quantum physics, alternatively. Fawly (talk) 19:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Did a bold split; please let me know if I made any errors. Fawly (talk) 05:47, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * what happened to the split?--ReyHahn (talk) 10:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Done, in Machine learning in physics. Fawly (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I agree with the split. The article talks a lot about the physics side of quantum machines so "physics" should be included in the title. Alexam22 (talk) 01:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Quantum Information Science and Engineering
— Assignment last updated by Za49 (talk) 05:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age
— Assignment last updated by Fedfed2 (talk) 00:54, 9 December 2023 (UTC)