Talk:Quick time event/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: RJaguar3 &#124; u  &#124;  t  01:14, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Placing review on hold to address concerns raised. This article was reviewed March 16, 2011; it will be reassessed seven days from now, on March 23, 2011 RJaguar3 &#124; u  &#124;  t  17:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * There seem to be two points to focus on here (I've tried to address the rest wrt to the same case-structure, fixing rationales). On the weasel-word statements, all of these (except for those in the lead, which I'm leaving unsourced as it is a summary) are followed immediately by the ref to support that statement. Are you looking for something different here?
 * On the images, I probably would agree that a mock-up image (possibly replicating the situation in the Shenmue picture by using free images of Wikipe-tan and a soccer ball) would help. --M ASEM  (t) 19:49, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Mock up of a QTE from free elements has been created. --M ASEM (t) 14:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your work on that. It looks like criterion 6 is now satisfied.  Regarding weasel words, I believe that the MoS advises for in-text attribution, such as "John Doe, writing for IGN, said that..."  That is, a name should be attached in-text to each statement that currently uses the passive voice ("is generally considered" and the like).  See WP:WEASEL for more about this.  RJaguar3 &#124;  u  &#124;  t  16:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Fail
After re-examining the article, the article still fails to meet criterion 1b, so I will fail the article for now. Once the article has been improved to meet the good article criteria, you are more than free to renominate. RJaguar3 &#124; u  &#124;  t  17:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)