Talk:RGraph

Does code...
belong in the article? Perhaps discuss here and reach consensus. David notMD (talk) 11:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

COI edits
I want to pay attention of other editors that a lot of significant edits including the addition of the code mentioned above have been made lately by user with WP:COI (acknowledged). At first glance those edits look really promotional adding excessive details. Opinions and efforts on how to best work on this article then are welcomed. Thank you. Avbgok (talk) 14:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

I've made edits and removed what I think is "promotional". Which bits do you question? Is there something else that you want me to do to the article? Revert it to what it was before I started editing it? I do like the box on the right-hand-side though. Plus I don't know what is meant by "needs citation" I've removed a few more bits - does it now fit with Wikipedia standards? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard heyes (talk • contribs) 20:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
Why is this article going to be deleted? I've removed anything that could be considered "promotional". Richard heyes (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The article has been proposed for deletion by an editor named . You can see the reason why this was done by looking at the "Proposed deletion" template added to the top of the article. If you or anyone disagrees with this assessment, you can WP:DEPROD the article. (Ideally, though it would be better if someone other than yourself did so, but you can deprod it.) If anyone disagrees with the de-prodding, they can then nominate the article for deletion at WP:AFD where a more formal discussion will take place to discuss the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

I have deprodded it according to WP:DEPROD as I consider this article passing WP:NSOFT and anyway we should remember about WP:CONTN. Informed Piotrus on their user talk page. Avbgok (talk) 08:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)