Talk:Rabbit vibrator

Advert
This whole article reads like an advert. Someone should fix.

As this is talking of Rabbit Vibrators, I have a link to a website that shows all the latest Elastomer models, with the latest technology. Emphasis on environment & recyclable.

I do not understand why a link to www.rabbitfeverthemovie.com is not allowed on this page

RABBIT FEVER is a feature film dedicated entirely to the Rabbit vibrator and, as such, anyone looking up Rabbit vibrator should at least be made aware the film exists.

Anyone researching Rabbit vibrator would surely want to know that such a film exists —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smjraphael (talk • contribs) 09:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and added a link to Rabbit Fever at the IMDB database (rather than a link directly to the film's web site - I don't have a problem with that - this at least links to a reputable source describing the movie and having further links (like reviews). -- Quartermaster (talk) 16:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia has become another publisher for adult toys and porn, Just to let you know my kids were looking for information about pets and this page come up, Not to say the least its degrading. I have barred my kidds from Wikipedia site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.177.1.232 (talk) 20:29, 25 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Good to know your "kidds" will be as educated as you. --174.19.158.92 (talk) 01:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Picture
Anyone got a good photo? Ideally the packaging, in use and size comparison  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hejog (talk • contribs) 09:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

What type of photo, of a rabbit vibrator? I have many —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lsonline1 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, not a photo - but I added an image I recently uploaded to the Commons just for such an emergency. We can do better, but at least this illustrates the little critter. -- Quartermaster (talk) 21:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Agree wikipedia has become a online advert for porn. I have now stopped my kids from using this site because of this page, when my 12 year old come in and asked why a rabbit vibrated i asked what she means and she showed me what she found on this site. I would not recomend any kids use wikipedia for home work study. You site has now been barred from our kids computers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.240.209 (talk) 08:34, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry have to agree with the woman, I am quite concerned as to why wikipedia would let people blatantly advertize porn and sex toys on their website. A lot of kids at schools use this website to gather information. Maybe they should put a warning on the front page that this site may contain links to porn and sex toys. WTG wikipedia !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.57.17 (talk) 10:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Merge
Aside from one Sex and the City episode, nothing distinguishes this article subject from other type of vibrator. Much of this article reads like a generic vibrator description with the word rabbit repeatedly prepended. I propose this be merged to Vibrator (sex toy). / edg ☺ ☭ 14:49, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * How about a documentary, or hundreds of news articles mentioning it. Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You may in effect be proposing a WP:SUMMARY article is needed so an In popular culture spottings section can be developed&mdash;I would say no, still merge to that.
 * What if an encyclopedic article could be written with a substantial amount of sourced information distinct from that in the Vibrator article? Sure, I'd be all for a freestanding Rabbit vibrator then. Do you think we have that now? / edg ☺ ☭ 20:32, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Any other objections? / edg ☺ ☭ 18:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Rabbit vibrator is a type of vibrator. Your argument seems to be that there is no reason for different types of sex toy vibrators to have their own pages. However, there are many cases of this, for instance bullet vibrators have their own page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_egg, anal vibrators have their own page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_vibrator, clitoral vibrators have their own page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_vibrator, g spot vibrators have their own page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-Spot_vibrator.

Rabbit vibrators are as distinct as any of the above vibrators, they are dual stimulation vibrators made for simultaneously stimulating the clitoris and vaginal (sometimes g spot). What are you going to do, go through and delete all the above pages too?

I say for as much reason as the above vibrators deserve their own pages, the rabbit vibrator certainly does -- and it doesn't make any sense deleting the rabbit vibrator page unless you can justify deleting all the above pages too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.84.106.141 (talk)
 * Per WP:OTHERCRAP, the existence of other, similar articles may indicate that many of those articles should be merged as well; it is not a defense for not merging this article. / edg ☺ ☭ 02:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

To Edgarde per above, let me say then that I completely disagree with the original statement that this article is generic, about a vibrator with the word "rabbit" prepended. Just glancing through the article, it mentions that rabbit vibrators are phallus (dildo shaped) with a clitoral stimulator -- there are no other vibrators like that on the market, i.e. unique. They are dual stimulation (internal and external) -- that is not generic to all vibrators, no other vibrators do that.

Furthermore, rabbit vibrators are incredibly popular. On "Sex Toy Dave's" blog (owner of sextoy.com and cnv.com, the largest outlet of retail and wholesale sex toys in the world) he says that "Traditionally most of the revenue has come from rabbit style vibrators and realistic dildos". http://www.sextoydave.com/questions.html The fact that rabbit style vibrators are mentioned first could be construed as this is the most popular selling type of sex toy in the world, at least in volume of sales revenue.

Therefore, unique type of sex toy + most popular selling in the world = article should stay. Then add on top of that the fact I mentioned earlier, that there are plenty of other similar articles with no one ever mentioning that they should be merged -- perhaps not a reason in itself not to merge, but coupled with the other arguments becomes just another reason not to. Last, it is my personal opinion that the article should stay -- there are plenty of people out there wondering exactly what a rabbit vibrator is and it is helpful to be given an explanation page at wikipedia, as opposed to only websites merely trying to sell a rabbit vibrator.

How to improve this article
Other than more references (including the claim for who originated it), it strikes me that this article needs to talk about the pearls, and relate them to pearl cockrings. The emphasis on newer non-phallic shapes seems a bit odd; higher-end manufacturers are experimenting with sleeker shapes, but this isn't peculiar in any way to rabbit vibes. The variations in the clitoral stimulator are more significant here. More importantly than either, what about the ones that thrust? There are also a few triple-headed models (incorporating anal stimulators of varying lengths), for example the California Exotic Novelties Glitter Glam Triple Play and the Le Rêve Bendable Triple Stimulation Rabbit Vibrator. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Remove aka to title
The jack rabbit and Jessica rabbit vibrators are both brand names as far as I know. Might as well include the rabbit pearl etc etc. I think we should get rid of them and stick to rabbit vibrator since many companies make versions of it. Unless someone can check how many people are searching wiki for those specific types of rabbits? Been here long enough I guess I should know how but since I don’t someone else would need to... I seem to be doing quite an overhaul on this article (came across some good sources and couldn’t resist) so if I get to the end of that and no other editors speak up to keep them I’ll probably go ahead... wiki algorithms permitting :) Dakinijones (talk) 07:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)